Brownstone » Articles for Jayanta Bhattacharya

Jayanta Bhattacharya

Jay Bhattacharya is a physician, epidemiologist and health economist. He is Professor at Stanford Medical School, a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economics Research, a Senior Fellow at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, a Faculty Member at the Stanford Freeman Spogli Institute, and a Fellow at the Academy of Science and Freedom. His research focuses on the economics of health care around the world with a particular emphasis on the health and well-being of vulnerable populations. Co-Author of the Great Barrington Declaration.

public health

The Power of Public Health Agencies Must Be Curbed

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Now that states are moving to restrict public health powers, public health authorities face a choice that will decide whether the public will ever trust public health again. They can fight a partisan political battle against these laws, and the collapse of public trust in public health will continue apace. Or they can gracefully accept limits to their power in light of their pandemic failures.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
Biden pandemic plan

The Dangers of the Biden Pandemic Plan

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Each of these cut corners has since created policy controversies and uncertainty that better trials would have avoided. Because of the pressure to produce a vaccine within 130 days, President Biden’s pandemic plan will likely force randomized trials on future vaccines to cut the same corners. This policy effectively guarantees that lockdowns will return to the U.S. in the event of a new pandemic.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The Economists Self-Censored and Inflation Is a Result

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Since the Spring of 2020, economists have had a strong incentive to censor themselves about the costs of covid measures for fear of being seen as out of step with the hastily achieved consensus that covid measures came without any significant costs to the public. Economists dismissed any dissent from the lockdown consensus. On Twitter and elsewhere, those few who dared dissent were labelled cranks or grandma killers. 


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The Global March of Folly

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Politicians argued that the draconian lockdowns were needed to protect lives. From the excess-mortality data, we now know they were not. Instead, they have contributed to the enormous collateral damage that we will have to live with for many years to come. It is tragic.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Vaccine Fanaticism Fuels Vaccine Skepticism

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The federal government went further, using its vast regulatory powers to mandate vaccines as a condition of employment. These coercive actions effectively cast the unvaccinated into second-class citizenship. As they watched the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike contract COVID-19, they undoubtedly began to wonder whether public health truly had their best interests at heart.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The Collins and Fauci Attack on Traditional Public Health

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

When we wrote the Declaration, we knew that we were putting our professional careers at risk, as well as our ability to provide for our families.  That was a conscious decision on our part, and we fully sympathize with people who instead decided to focus on maintaining their important research laboratories and activities.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Straight Talk about the Precautionary Principle

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Whenever applied, the precautionary principle needs to be challenged and stand scrutiny, to help us make decisions when there is uncertainty, and the situation is in flux as is typical in a pandemic.  These alternatives emphasize seeking new facts, being rigorously honest about the evidence, being open to being wrong, adjusting our actions as we come to understand more, and communicating with trust, not fear. 


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
Stay Informed with Brownstone