Today’s primary care physician is a pharmaceutical compliance officer, a corporate protocol to follow, and overlords tracking their every move. They’ve transitioned from medical professionals to medication pushers, from trusted advisors to glorified drug dealers with better parking.
How Your Family Doc Became a Drug Enforcement Agent Read Journal Article
True, Kennedy is not a psychiatrist. But as a lawyer who has spent decades exposing the failures of public health institutions, he understands where scrutiny is needed. Moreover, Kennedy is not issuing medical directives—he is demanding accountability.
RFK Junior Attacked for His Stance on Psychotropic Meds Read Journal Article
The revelations revolve around confirmation of clear conflicts of interest, deliberate data manipulation, and attribution of adverse outcomes to the virus rather than from its treatment; all of which were used to promote a false narrative and public health strategy.
Have We Lived through a Public Health Holocaust? Read Journal Article
It feels almost dangerous putting those three words in the title of an article. If science is simply a matter of evidence and causal inference, it should be fearless and not doctrinaire. It should go where evidence leads.
Killing survivors, which is the current USDA policy, is certifiably insane. But it whips the nation into a fearful frenzy, ready to buy eggs from Turkey so we won’t starve to death. The conventional narrative reeks of anti-science and fraud.
At least 30% of Republicans (65% of Democrats) agree that WHO health professionals aim to help nations improve health and at least a third of Democrats (70% of Republicans) agree that the WHO is too close to nations like China.
Voter Opinion about the WHO Driven by Party Affiliation Read Journal Article
This week, Ioannidis and his colleagues published a paper on Covid-19 advocacy bias in the BMJ, concluding that the ‘BMJ had a strong bias in favour of authors advocating an aggressive approach to COVID-19 mitigation.’
This article tells the story of one of the most disturbing breaches of scientific ethics we’ve encountered in our academic careers—buried in the peer-review process of one of the world’s leading vaccination journals.
Ethical Collapse in the Peer Review of a Leading Vaccine Journal Read Journal Article
Immanent critique is the ultimate academic flex. It shows that you understand your opponent’s argument better than they understand it themselves. It disarms your opponent without a clash of swords (metaphorical or literal).
If we want to restore trust in vaccination, we must move beyond the binary thinking of “pro-vaccine” versus “anti-vaccine”. Acknowledging the complexity of vaccines is the only way to ensure that public health policies serve the best interests of all.
The increasing rule of efficiency over truth is a sign of sliding into totalitarianism. And a sign of the decline of one of the key tenets of human dignity: the inner sense of truth.
Christine Grady, HHS chief of bioethics (now retired, unless she chooses Alaska), and her husband, Dr. Anthony Fauci at NIAID, were central figures during the Zika virus controversy. Grady helped shape ethical guidelines, underlying those for a potential Zika vaccine.
