Brownstone » Vaccines

Vaccines

woke religion

What and Why is ‘Woke?’ 

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Woke’s lust for destruction has emerged from the heart of a decaying Western society. Woke is an attack on the most potent and healthy elements of that society, backed by the super-rich who seek more control. At once a sterile new religion of the useless to celebrate uselessness, a fanatical doomsday cult, and a thief of what is good, healthy and self-affirming, woke represents in four letters what ails the West, and the antithesis of what is needed to heal the West.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
accidental discovery

The Vax-Gene Files: An Accidental Discovery

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

If McKernan’s findings are verified, the implications are serious. Widespread DNA contamination would bring into question the quality of the entire mRNA injection manufacturing process, safety systems, and regulatory oversight. In addition, DNA might not be the only contaminant.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
elite pride

The Cosplay of Elite Pride 

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

So many of our narratives contort public policy failures into a simulated pride for apocryphal success, incidentally acknowledging the imperfections in order to cover the bodies. From the initial days of the lockdowns, there were way too many people with paychecks talking. All the voices on all of our telescreens enjoyed uninterrupted direct deposit while aggressively advocating the closure of tens of thousands of small businesses – first to flatten the curve, then to slow the spread, then to await the vaccines.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
Downplaying adverse effects

Downplaying the Adverse Effects of Boosters

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Downplaying. That has been a handy weapon against anything that threatened the official Covid narrative. Downplaying skeptical voices, downplaying uncertainties, downplaying contradictory data. I recently described a typical example of the latter from Denmark. Here is another one, from Israel, which gives us a dual opportunity.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
ESG woke Pfizer

Pfizer’s New Woke Face 

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

It is also likely that some mutual back-scratching is at play in Pfizer’s support for the Voice. The Australian Government did Pfizer a solid when it signed off on secret Covid vaccine contracts that the public is not privy to, provisionally approved the under-tested shots despite glaring reasons not to, and purchased stocks in gross excess, resulting in massive wastage. Now, it’s Pfizer’s turn to add value to the Australian Government’s agenda. As previously mentioned, the sitting government is leading the YES campaign for the Voice referendum.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
claims lack foundation

Farewell Questions for Rochelle Walensky

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

If we would seek to have the agencies of public health act as something other than a marketing arm and apologist for the revolving door of Pharma with whom they seem to so regularly swap staff and sinecure then it must once more be turned to serve the public. It may do so only if it regains the public trust and such trust, once lost, may only be restored by asking the hard questions and diligently following the answers wherever so they may lead until we may understand what went wrong, hold the negligent or malefactors to account, and have the means to prevent this from happening again.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
comparing risks

Comparing Risks: The Right and Wrong Way

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Scientists must stop making incorrect comparisons, and health authorities must stop claiming that the serious symptoms and injuries linked to vaccination are “very rare,” while at the same time omitting to inform that the risk of corresponding, infection-related afflictions in the unvaccinated state actually is lower.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
competing interests

A Failure to Disclose Competing Interests

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

This is a story of an author who promoted COVID-19 vaccine uptake among adolescents while failing to disclose significant competing interests (e.g., his holding of an unrestricted research grant from Pfizer). This is also a story of a failure of the author’s publisher Nature Reviews Cardiology to enforce Nature Portfolio’s declaration-of-competing-interests policy.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
biden sham compassion

Biden’s Sham Compassion for His Covid Persecution Victims

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The Biden administration will end the vaccine mandate for health care workers on May 11. But don’t expect politicians and bureaucrats to honor the “First, Do No Harm” rule in the future. Inside the Beltway, federal edicts will likely continue to be “close enough for government work” to sane health care policies.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
gain of function

What Good Comes from Gain-of-Function?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Though almost all lab-based scientific research and advancements carry at least a tiny element of risk, nothing like the level of terminal, global, and trans-generational risk of GOF has – to the public’s knowledge – been undertaken since the Manhattan Project and the study of radiation. And even that had very specific, very probable, and very real and tangible benefits (useful for “pure” or basic science, ending World War II, power generation, nuclear medicine, etc.) that GOF cannot begin to claim. 


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
paxton v. moderna

Was this Deceptive Trade? Paxton v. Moderna 

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Suing vaccine makers is notoriously difficult by design. Alone among private producers, they are indemnified against nearly all harm thanks to government privilege. That makes them mostly off-limits for legal liability from vaccine injuries. Eliminate that provision and the companies would not likely even be in business at all, which tells you all you need to know. However, deceptive claims are a separate issue. Finally we might have here a perfectly crafted legal position to hold these run-amuk companies accountable.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
big fail

The Big Fail

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

If vaccines were immunizing people then countries that went in big for vaccination should have seen a more favorable CHANGE in their Covid death rates from the first to the second year than was true for the countries that did not vaccinate much. This is the fundamental premise on which the following study is built.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
Stay Informed with Brownstone