Brownstone » Articles for Will Jones

Will Jones

Will Jones is editor of the Daily Sceptic.

engineered wuhan

Engineered, Yes, but in the Wuhan Lab?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

In fact, there is no evidence the Chinese were aware of the outbreak at all before December. U.S. intelligence has stated it does not have evidence the Chinese were aware of it prior to then, and this is consistent with how the Chinese themselves behaved. 


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
coronavirus lab leak

Rumors of the Lab Leak Began with US Intelligence

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The first known mention of the idea that the coronavirus may have originated in a Chinese lab appeared on January 9th 2020 in a report by Radio Free Asia (RFA). This was just days after the virus had first entered public consciousness, and at the time, no deaths had yet been reported and few people were worrying about the virus – including, it seems, the Chinese, who were claiming it wasn’t even clear whether it was spreading between humans. 


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
The Evidence COVID-19 Was Spreading Around the World in Late 2019

The Evidence COVID-19 Was Spreading Around the World in Late 2019

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

On this evidence it seems we can definitively rule out both an emergence before July 2019 (too many negatives and just one questionable positive) and after November 2019 (too many positives in a number of countries). The evidence is not currently consistent or robust enough to be able to pin it down more definitively than that.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
coverup

New Emails Chronicle Lab-Leak Coverup in Real Time

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The picture is increasingly coming into focus. The Chinese Government, Fauci & Co and many within the U.S. intelligence community and biodefence network are covering up the origin of the virus and frustrating efforts to investigate it because they are themselves implicated in the research that likely created it and because they do not want biodefence research discredited.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Was the Pandemic Orchestrated as a Trial Run for Responding to a Biological Attack?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The pandemic response was largely a creation of the U.S. biodefence network, with China joining in after January 23rd. U.S. intelligence officers had been following the virus (which they, like the CCP, knew was lab-engineered) from mid-November, and the biodefence network made sure news of the virus got out once doctors noticed it, spreading alarm before there was anything really to be alarmed about and treating it immediately as a biosecurity threat.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
How deadly is Covid

How Deadly Is Covid? A Major Study Defies Conventional Wisdom

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

In the new study, which is currently undergoing peer-review, Prof. Ioannidis and colleagues found that across 31 national seroprevalence studies in the pre-vaccination era, the average (median) infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was estimated to be just 0.035% for people aged 0-59 years and 0.095% for those aged 0-69 years.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Why Did Covid Cause Thousands of Deaths in Spring 2020 Even Though it Had Been Hanging Around All Winter?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

There is now no shortage of evidence that the coronavirus had begun spreading undetected all over the world by autumn 2019 at the latest. So why did the virus suddenly become much more infectious in February 2020; why did it go from circulating at a low level alongside flu and other viruses to displacing them and infecting a relatively large proportion of the population in a space of weeks?


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Lockdowns and Fast-Track Vaccines: The Origin Story

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

A key takehome is it wasn’t just panic. The response to the COVID-19 pandemic represented the triumph of a pseudo-scientific biosecurity agenda that emerged in 2005 and has been pushed ever since by a well-organised, well-funded and well-embedded network of ideologues. These fanatics promote and perpetuate the ideas underpinning the draconian new approach by publishing them in leading journals, planting them in public policy and law, pushing them in the media and smearing those who dissent, however eminent or well-qualified.


SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
Stay Informed with Brownstone