Search
Close this search box.

Search Results for: IHR

WHO is Wrong to Rush the Vote

The WHO is Wrong to Rush the Vote 

By / / , / 9 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently put up a defense of its violation of its own legal requirements by submitting draft amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) for a vote at the 77th World Health Assembly (WHA) this May. This was in response to various concerns raised in parliaments and civil society. This matters because (i) in ignoring legal requirements and rushing a vote the WHO is putting global health and economies at risk, and (ii) the WHO is acting like a spoiled child, which suggests the organization is no longer fit for its mandate.

The WHO is Wrong to Rush the Vote  Read More

World Health Organization

An Unofficial Q&A on International Health Regulations

By / / / 13 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The WHO has become a tool of those who would manipulate us for greed and self-interest. In previous eras, people have stood against those who sought to exploit and enslave them, reclaimed their rights and saved society for their children. What we are facing is not new; society periodically faces and overcomes such challenges.

An Unofficial Q&A on International Health Regulations Read More

Government and the WHO Quietly Shake Hands

Government and the WHO Quietly Shake Hands

By / / , / 10 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

It would be unforgivable for the public not to be given more clarity on this important issue. We must see the full detail of what we are being signed up to. The time to speak up about it is now, rather than after the event. If there is nothing for the government and the WHO to hide, they should disclose this information. The British public has a right to know and we should be given an opportunity to either accept or reject what is being proposed behind closed doors.

Government and the WHO Quietly Shake Hands Read More

A Primer on the WHO, the Treaty, and its Plans for Pandemic Preparedness

By / / , / 13 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

These proposed rules and structures, if adopted, would fundamentally change international public health, moving the center of gravity from common endemic diseases to relatively rare outbreaks of new pathogens, and building an industry around it that will potentially be self-perpetuating.

A Primer on the WHO, the Treaty, and its Plans for Pandemic Preparedness Read More

WHO’s Guilty of Fake News, Now? - Brownstone Institute

WHO’s Guilty of Fake News, Now?

By / / , / 11 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

With media shying away from publishing views critical of the WHO and its pharma sponsors, our politicians remain naively blind to the web of ulterior, vested motivations driving the restructuring of global public health. But with one set of actors coming to the table with clean hands — no undisclosed financial incentives nor purse strings pulled by profit-driven corporations — and the other with hands stained by pharmaceutical profits and dancing to the tune of undisclosed funders, who would the public trust were they only to be fed the facts?

WHO’s Guilty of Fake News, Now? Read More

Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States’ Sovereignty?

Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States’ Sovereignty?

By / / , , / 15 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

If it is indeed the case that our authorities and their supporters within the public health community consider that powers currently vested within national jurisdictions should be given over to external bodies on the basis of this level of recorded harm, it would be best to have a public conversation as to whether this is sufficient basis for abandoning democratic ideals in favor of a more fascist or otherwise authoritarian approach. We are, after all, talking about restricting basic human rights essential for a democracy to function. 

Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States’ Sovereignty? Read More

The WHO Wants to Rule the World - Brownstone Institute

The WHO Wants to Rule the World

By / / , , / 13 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The World Health Organisation (WHO) will present two new texts for adoption by its governing body, the World Health Assembly comprising delegates from 194 member states, in Geneva on 27 May–1 June. The new pandemic treaty needs a two-thirds majority for approval and, if and once adopted, will come into effect after 40 ratifications.

The WHO Wants to Rule the World Read More

Brownstone Institute - Governments Must Reject New Amendments to International Health Regulations

Governments Must Reject New Amendments to International Health Regulations

By / / , / 5 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The WHO, most likely with the complicity of your government, is pushing through a set of amendments to international pandemic laws that will put your livelihood and liberties at the mercy of a WHO-appointed “expert committee” whose advice during a pandemic or other “public health emergency” will supersede that of your own government.

Governments Must Reject New Amendments to International Health Regulations Read More

The WHO Takes Another Step Towards the Pit

The WHO Takes Another Step Towards the Pit

By / / , , / 8 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Last week, amid fanfare from both advocates and opponents of centralization of future pandemic management, the world continued its unfortunate stumble back to old-fashioned public health fascism. The World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted the package of amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR), apparently just hours after a final text had been agreed by its IHR working group.

The WHO Takes Another Step Towards the Pit Read More

Facebook Gettr Twitter Youtube Linkedin Instagram Flipboard Telegram Rss

BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE
2028 E BEN WHITE BLVD, #240-3088
AUSTIN, TX 78741
+1-469-842-8976
—
WEST HARTFORD, CT

Brownstone Institute is a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit registered in the US under EIN: 87-1368060

Stay Informed with Brownstone Institute