Search Results for: IHR

Here are the search results for your search.

These Amendments Would Open the Door to a Dangerous Global Health Bureacracy

These Amendments Would Open the Door to a Dangerous Global Health Bureaucracy

By / / , , / 12 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The Covid pandemic gave the World Health Organisation and its partners unprecedented visibility and a tremendous amount of “soft” power to shape public health law and policies across the world. Over the past year or so, the WHO has been pushing hard to consolidate and expand its power to declare and manage public health emergencies on a global scale.

These Amendments Would Open the Door to a Dangerous Global Health Bureaucracy Read Journal Article

WHO is Wrong to Rush the Vote

The WHO is Wrong to Rush the Vote 

By / / , / 9 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently put up a defense of its violation of its own legal requirements by submitting draft amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) for a vote at the 77th World Health Assembly (WHA) this May. This was in response to various concerns raised in parliaments and civil society. This matters because (i) in ignoring legal requirements and rushing a vote the WHO is putting global health and economies at risk, and (ii) the WHO is acting like a spoiled child, which suggests the organization is no longer fit for its mandate.

The WHO is Wrong to Rush the Vote  Read Journal Article

World Health Organization

An Unofficial Q&A on International Health Regulations

By / / / 13 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The WHO has become a tool of those who would manipulate us for greed and self-interest. In previous eras, people have stood against those who sought to exploit and enslave them, reclaimed their rights and saved society for their children. What we are facing is not new; society periodically faces and overcomes such challenges.

An Unofficial Q&A on International Health Regulations Read Journal Article

Government and the WHO Quietly Shake Hands

Government and the WHO Quietly Shake Hands

By / / , / 10 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

It would be unforgivable for the public not to be given more clarity on this important issue. We must see the full detail of what we are being signed up to. The time to speak up about it is now, rather than after the event. If there is nothing for the government and the WHO to hide, they should disclose this information. The British public has a right to know and we should be given an opportunity to either accept or reject what is being proposed behind closed doors.

Government and the WHO Quietly Shake Hands Read Journal Article

A Primer on the WHO, the Treaty, and its Plans for Pandemic Preparedness

By / / , / 13 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

These proposed rules and structures, if adopted, would fundamentally change international public health, moving the center of gravity from common endemic diseases to relatively rare outbreaks of new pathogens, and building an industry around it that will potentially be self-perpetuating.

A Primer on the WHO, the Treaty, and its Plans for Pandemic Preparedness Read Journal Article

WHO’s Guilty of Fake News, Now? - Brownstone Institute

WHO’s Guilty of Fake News, Now?

By / / , / 11 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

With media shying away from publishing views critical of the WHO and its pharma sponsors, our politicians remain naively blind to the web of ulterior, vested motivations driving the restructuring of global public health. But with one set of actors coming to the table with clean hands — no undisclosed financial incentives nor purse strings pulled by profit-driven corporations — and the other with hands stained by pharmaceutical profits and dancing to the tune of undisclosed funders, who would the public trust were they only to be fed the facts?

WHO’s Guilty of Fake News, Now? Read Journal Article

Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States’ Sovereignty?

Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States’ Sovereignty?

By / / , , / 15 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

If it is indeed the case that our authorities and their supporters within the public health community consider that powers currently vested within national jurisdictions should be given over to external bodies on the basis of this level of recorded harm, it would be best to have a public conversation as to whether this is sufficient basis for abandoning democratic ideals in favor of a more fascist or otherwise authoritarian approach. We are, after all, talking about restricting basic human rights essential for a democracy to function. 

Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States’ Sovereignty? Read Journal Article

Confusion and Clarity: Excerpts from House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Report

Confusion and Clarity: Excerpts from House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Report

By / / , / 16 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Despite sections with refreshing clarity and depth, the report is also often shallow and dismissive of fundamental issues. It fails to assess with evidence the overall effectiveness of the lockdown-mass vaccination paradigm, making sometimes contradictory claims.

Confusion and Clarity: Excerpts from House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Report Read Journal Article

The WHO Wants to Rule the World - Brownstone Institute

The WHO Wants to Rule the World

By / / , , / 13 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The World Health Organisation (WHO) will present two new texts for adoption by its governing body, the World Health Assembly comprising delegates from 194 member states, in Geneva on 27 May–1 June. The new pandemic treaty needs a two-thirds majority for approval and, if and once adopted, will come into effect after 40 ratifications.

The WHO Wants to Rule the World Read Journal Article

Join the Brownstone Community
Get our FREE Journal Newsletter