Search Results for: world+health+organization

Here are the search results for your search.

Is There Hope for International Rule of Law?

Is There Hope for International Rule of Law?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Have governments realized that they have been misled by repetitive G20, WHO, and the World Bank’s messages that there would be more harmful pandemics to come and that the world urgently needs new pandemic agreements? If they return to their senses, there may still be time for them to use Article 56(5) IHR to raise disagreement with the WHO’s interpretation of Article 55(2) to the coming WHA, demanding a deferral of the vote until legal requirements are fulfilled.

Is There Hope for International Rule of Law? Read Journal Article

False Messaging Forever: The WHO’s Plan for the Future 

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Despite its massive internal contradictions, disproportionate cost, coercion, and requirement for its promoters to live obvious lies, COVAX and the entire mass-vaccination paradigm has created a strong model for success of the wider pandemic preparedness project. If truth in public health can be so readily dispensed with, and those working in the field so willingly corralled, the potential for milking the public’s trust and desire for safety presents unprecedented potential for profit. 

False Messaging Forever: The WHO’s Plan for the Future  Read Journal Article

The Lockdown Advocacy of Devi Sridhar

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

We will wait in vain for any sort of extended literary mea culpas. Not even the pensive afterword comes close. After all, when the next great health crisis presents itself, the WHO pushes for lockdowns again, and the major media empires need some great excuse to order people back home to be glued to the screen, the expertise of these compelling pundits – now with real media experience – will need to be called upon again. 

The Lockdown Advocacy of Devi Sridhar Read Journal Article

Great Reset

Adam Smith Vs. the Great Reset

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The book is an act of intimidation. It presages growing governmentalization, it advocates growing governmentalization, and communicates: Obey us or get hurt. Knuckle under or we will hurt you. The book is not only anti-liberal in its political outlook, it is illiberal in its manner of discoursing. Its whole manner is dishonest; the book is disagreeable to any dignified and self-respecting reader. 

Adam Smith Vs. the Great Reset Read Journal Article