en 
Liber-net has built a database of almost 1000 federal government awards from 2016-2024 that went towards countering “misinformation”. That work looked partly at government funding but focused more on the leading censorship organisations and their often public and private support.
Key Nodes of Federal Government Censorship Read Journal Article
Last week, DOGE dismantled USAID demolition derby style. A lot of dubious government funding was finally facing public scrutiny, but often the story seemed to be “look what we discovered” when much of the information has been online for years.
While public officials touted party lines, a more insidious censorship operation worked to eradicate dissent from the marketplace of ideas. As Judge Terry Doughty wrote, Covid censorship sparked arguably “the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history.”
It is time to reveal to the public the political interference that supported the Facebook takedowns. If Facebook wants to make amends, it needs to revisit its past mistakes and assess the impact its mistaken policy had during the pandemic.
The truth about government censorship continues to emerge for those willing to examine the evidence. Regardless of the final legal outcome in our case, we are succeeding through the discovery process in shedding much-needed light on the government’s operations.
Court Filings Reveal More Government Lies about Censorship Read Journal Article
These hearings will probably constitute the closest thing to real debates the public will get to hear from officials offering myriad critiques of the world’s coordinated response to the “threat” of Covid-19.
We have to be prepared for this future manifesting in various planning stages. This is why terms such as “information disorder” and “information disorder syndrome” are being propagated throughout new media and must be rejected at all levels.
With the censorship activities that even Mark Zuckerberg admits has happened, it is now abundantly evident that the people in control and in power are actively subverting and bypassing the “consent of the governed.”
The Secular State Reinvents the Inquisition Read Journal Article
Zuckerberg’s recent statements highlight the dereliction of the Supreme Court, including Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kavanaugh, and Justice Barrett in their failure to uphold the First Amendment against the winds of political pressure.
What “Reaction” might cause a “Problem” for the tyrant when we consider the “Solution” that is the under 16 social media ban? “Problems” as such don’t even necessarily have to be related to the “Solution”. Just be a problem.
When the Solution Is Tyranny, Be a Problem Read Journal Article
In a win for free speech advocates, the Australian Government formally abandoned its misinformation bill. The proposed laws would have forced social media companies to show that they were preventing the spread of misinformation and disinformation on their platforms.
Free Speech Win Down Under as Misinformation Bill Is Officially Binned Read Journal Article
Meta’s dismantling of its fact-checking program – announced by Zuckerberg as a “cultural tipping point towards prioritizing speech” – reads like a quiet footnote to what may be one of the most staggering violations of fundamental rights in recent memory.
The Cost of Facebook’s Now-Repudiated Censorship Read Journal Article
German
French
Italian
Spanish
Portuguese
Dutch
Danish
Swedish
Polish
Czech
Armenian
Russian
Romanian
Turkish
Japanese
Korean
Chinese (Simplified)
Hindi
Swahili
Amharic
Yoruba
