en 
Why should you care about the curious case of Dr. Peter Marks, MD, PhD? Because Dr. Peter Marks provides an excellent case study of what happens when the government settles for acceptable instead of excellent in scientific administrator (bureaucrat) positions.
The Curious Case of the FDA’s Dr. Peter Marks Read Journal Article
Laura Delano’s book weaves together these pieces into an alarming tale of tragedy followed by final hope. From the first chapter in which the supposed problems begin, I could not wait to see how the author would handle the ending.
Unshrunk: A Story of Psychiatric Treatment Resistance is more than a memoir of Laura Delano’s journey through pain, survival, and recovery. It is a fearless, forensic examination of a psychiatric system that often harms those it is meant to help.
Unshrunk: Laura Delano’s Breakaway from Psychiatry Read Journal Article
Today’s primary care physician is a pharmaceutical compliance officer, a corporate protocol to follow, and overlords tracking their every move. They’ve transitioned from medical professionals to medication pushers, from trusted advisors to glorified drug dealers with better parking.
How Your Family Doc Became a Drug Enforcement Agent Read Journal Article
True, Kennedy is not a psychiatrist. But as a lawyer who has spent decades exposing the failures of public health institutions, he understands where scrutiny is needed. Moreover, Kennedy is not issuing medical directives—he is demanding accountability.
RFK Junior Attacked for His Stance on Psychotropic Meds Read Journal Article
The revelations revolve around confirmation of clear conflicts of interest, deliberate data manipulation, and attribution of adverse outcomes to the virus rather than from its treatment; all of which were used to promote a false narrative and public health strategy.
Have We Lived through a Public Health Holocaust? Read Journal Article
It feels almost dangerous putting those three words in the title of an article. If science is simply a matter of evidence and causal inference, it should be fearless and not doctrinaire. It should go where evidence leads.
Killing survivors, which is the current USDA policy, is certifiably insane. But it whips the nation into a fearful frenzy, ready to buy eggs from Turkey so we won’t starve to death. The conventional narrative reeks of anti-science and fraud.
At least 30% of Republicans (65% of Democrats) agree that WHO health professionals aim to help nations improve health and at least a third of Democrats (70% of Republicans) agree that the WHO is too close to nations like China.
Voter Opinion about the WHO Driven by Party Affiliation Read Journal Article
This week, Ioannidis and his colleagues published a paper on Covid-19 advocacy bias in the BMJ, concluding that the ‘BMJ had a strong bias in favour of authors advocating an aggressive approach to COVID-19 mitigation.’
This article tells the story of one of the most disturbing breaches of scientific ethics we’ve encountered in our academic careers—buried in the peer-review process of one of the world’s leading vaccination journals.
Ethical Collapse in the Peer Review of a Leading Vaccine Journal Read Journal Article
Immanent critique is the ultimate academic flex. It shows that you understand your opponent’s argument better than they understand it themselves. It disarms your opponent without a clash of swords (metaphorical or literal).
German
French
Italian
Spanish
Portuguese
Dutch
Danish
Swedish
Polish
Czech
Armenian
Russian
Romanian
Turkish
Japanese
Korean
Chinese (Simplified)
Hindi
Swahili
Amharic
Yoruba
