Search Results for: IHR

Here are the search results for your search.

UN declaration

The UN’s New Political Declaration on Pandemics

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The main aim of the Declaration is to back the proposed WHO international health regulation (IHR) amendments and treaty (PP26), key to ensuring that viral outbreaks that have such a small impact can remain highly profitable. An additional $10 billion per year in new financing is requested to support this (PP29). There is a reason why most countries have laws against scams. The UN and its agencies, fortunately for its staff, are outside of any national jurisdiction.

The UN’s New Political Declaration on Pandemics Read Journal Article

The Pandemic Treaty Will Compound Past Mistakes

The Pandemic Treaty Will Compound Past Mistakes 

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

To simply vote no would leave the current situation – the situation that led to the many Covid-19 pandemic failures – unaddressed. But any putative “benefit” of the new treaty is likely to be marginal at best. More importantly, the treaty and amendments as they are currently written do enormous, identifiable harm and would leave everyone, except those with stakes in Big Pharma, IT services, and global finance, far worse off.

The Pandemic Treaty Will Compound Past Mistakes  Read Journal Article

WHO’s Proposals

Why Legislators Should Reject the WHO’s Proposals for Pandemics

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The WHO’s funding arrangements, its track record, and the perverse nature of its proposed pandemic response should be enough to render these proposed agreements anathema in democratic States. If implemented, they should make WHO unfit to receive public funding or provide health advice. The international community can benefit from coordination in health, but it would be reckless to entrust that role to an organization clearly serving other interests.

Why Legislators Should Reject the WHO’s Proposals for Pandemics Read Journal Article

WHO a threat

The WHO Has Changed and Now It is a Threat

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

We can meekly accept this new disease-obsessed world, some may even embrace the salaries and careers it bestows. Or we can join those fighting for the simple right of individuals to determine their own future, free from the false public goods of colonialism and fascism. At the very least, we can acknowledge the reality around us.

The WHO Has Changed and Now It is a Threat Read Journal Article

pandemic treaty state sponsor Germany

The German Origins of the Pandemic Treaty

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Lo and behold, if we go back far enough – before hardly anyone will have ever even heard the expression ‘pandemic treaty’ – we discover that the treaty did indeed have a state sponsor and that, unsurprisingly, the state in question is the very same state which, if albeit unbeknownst to the broader public, was the driving force behind the WHO’s Covid-19 ‘pandemic response:’ namely, Germany.

The German Origins of the Pandemic Treaty Read Journal Article

The State of Pandemic Preparedness, the WHO, and the US Withdrawal

The State of Pandemic Preparedness, the WHO, and the US Withdrawal

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

On January 20th, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order “withdrawing the United States from the World Health Organization.” The US will “cease” negotiations on the WHO Pandemic Agreement and the International Health Regulations.

The State of Pandemic Preparedness, the WHO, and the US Withdrawal Read Journal Article

Letters to the Patronising Fools in Parliament

Letters to the Patronising Fools in Parliament

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

One doesn’t have to look too hard, these days, to find examples of foolish patronising poseurs – the various chambers of our state and federal parliaments are ‘target-rich environments,’ as they say. A case in point has come to my attention, compelling me to expose the utter contempt in which some parliamentarians hold their constituents.

Letters to the Patronising Fools in Parliament Read Journal Article