Government

Government articles provide in-depth analysis of government agencies and their profound impacts on economics, public health, public dialogue, individual liberty, social life, and personal freedoms.

Brownstone critically examines overreach, surveillance programs, digital ID systems, bureaucratic fraud, public health mandates, international organizations (e.g., WHO), national security policies, and emerging threats like technocratic control and institutional trust erosion. Topics include government-controlled digital IDs, vaccine policy shifts, autism guidance revisions, antidepressant information wars, sovereignty vs. global governance, and pathways to policy reform that prioritize human rights, free markets, and open society.

All government articles from Brownstone Institute are translated into multiple languages to enable global access, foster international open dialogue, and support readers worldwide in challenging centralized power and promoting evidence-based alternatives.

5 Reasons Pfizer’s Reply to President Trump Is Complete Rubbish

5 Reasons Pfizer’s Reply to President Trump Is Complete Rubbish

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Pfizer’s reply to President Trump’s very reasonable call for transparency of data regarding their latest edition of their modified-mRNA Covid injections is nothing less than an insult to the intelligence of every reader, including the President himself.

5 Reasons Pfizer’s Reply to President Trump Is Complete Rubbish Read Journal Article

Toby Rogers' to the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations

Toby Rogers’ Statement to the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

I changed my doctoral thesis topic to “The Political Economy of Autism” and spent the next four years reading and analyzing nearly everything that has been written on autism prevalence, causation, and cost.

Toby Rogers’ Statement to the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Read Journal Article

Savages in the Senate: Kennedy Ambushed in a Game of Dirty Politics

Savages in the Senate: Kennedy Ambushed in a Game of Dirty Politics

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

What the hearing revealed was not Kennedy’s weakness but the desperation of his critics — senators clinging to captured institutions, hurling insults and posturing for the cameras. For all the talk of “science,” what unfolded was politics at its dirtiest.

Savages in the Senate: Kennedy Ambushed in a Game of Dirty Politics Read Journal Article

Response to Save HHS Letter: In Defense of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Response to Save HHS Letter: In Defense of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

I respectfully disagree with the Save HHS letter calling for Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s resignation. While concerns have been raised, these must be balanced against the urgent need for bold reform and restoration of public trust in health institutions.

Response to Save HHS Letter: In Defense of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Read Journal Article

Dissent Goes Mainstream

J. Crew-Anon and the Mainstreaming of Dissent

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The question is not whether J.Crew-Anon exists. It does. Whether its ascendance will be enough to quell the growing rebellion from working-class ranks who are not nearly as polite, elitely-educated, or establishment-adjacent as their J.Crew-Anon neighbors remains to be seen.

J. Crew-Anon and the Mainstreaming of Dissent Read Journal Article

Did the CDC Mislead Its Advisers on the RSV Antibody for Babies?

Did the CDC Mislead Its Advisers on the RSV Antibody for Babies?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The seizure risk could apply to all RSV monoclonal antibodies now approved, potentially affecting millions of newborns. If the CDC presents safety data in a way that downplays clear signals of harm, the promise of a “reformed” advisory process collapses before it begins.

Did the CDC Mislead Its Advisers on the RSV Antibody for Babies? Read Journal Article

Join the Brownstone Community
Get our FREE Journal Newsletter