Royal Society Ignores High-Quality Evidence and Embraces Politically Acceptable Conclusions
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
The Royal Society review shows that some academics are losing their ability to think critically. Instead of retrofitting evidence to preconceived conclusions,... Read more.
The Latest in the War on Science
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
We do not know what spooked the Editor in Chief, but given the speed and highly unprofessional nature of the reaction, could it be one of their big funders? H... Read more.
It’s Open Season on Scientists
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
We warned our readers a couple of weeks back that opinion pieces were taking on the role of editors of scientific journals. We stated, “The arguments put fo... Read more.
How New Zealand Dealt with “Disinformation”
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
Cases may not have been active cases, hospitalisations may not be due to SARS-CoV-2, and deaths may be due to various causes related or unrelated to SARs-CoV... Read more.
Drinking and Excess Deaths in lockdown
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
These are deaths wholly attributable to alcohol, which means that at least 27.4% more of our fellow citizens have drunk themselves to death thanks to the imposi... Read more.
The Early Estimates of the Fatality Rate Were Very Wrong
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
The consequences of overestimating the IFR are profound. It overpredicts the number of deaths and influences political decision-making without considering the l... Read more.
Timeline on the UK Response: Open-Source Project
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
We have asked for readers’ help to build a freely available timeline of the six critical decision timepoints with links to primary documents underpinning poli... Read more.
The UK Covid Response: A Stool with Three Legs
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
Misuse of PCR underpinned the whole narrative. Its very high sensitivity and robotic acceptance as a gold standard created the illusion of many more cases (i.e.... Read more.