• All
  • Censorship
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Government
  • History
  • Law
  • Masks
  • Media
  • Pharma
  • Philosophy
  • Policy
  • Psychology
  • Public Health
  • Society
  • Technology
  • Vaccines
Brownstone » Law » Page 4

Law

Law articles feature analysis and commentary related to censorship, policy, technology, media, economics, public health, and social life.

All Brownstone Institute articles on the topic of law are translated into multiple languages.

Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States’ Sovereignty?

Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States’ Sovereignty?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

If it is indeed the case that our authorities and their supporters within the public health community consider that powers currently vested within national jurisdictions should be given over to external bodies on the basis of this level of recorded harm, it would be best to have a public conversation as to whether this is sufficient basis for abandoning democratic ideals in favor of a more fascist or otherwise authoritarian approach. We are, after all, talking about restricting basic human rights essential for a democracy to function. 

Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States’ Sovereignty? Read More »

These Amendments Would Open the Door to a Dangerous Global Health Bureacracy

These Amendments Would Open the Door to a Dangerous Global Health Bureaucracy

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The Covid pandemic gave the World Health Organisation and its partners unprecedented visibility and a tremendous amount of “soft” power to shape public health law and policies across the world. Over the past year or so, the WHO has been pushing hard to consolidate and expand its power to declare and manage public health emergencies on a global scale.

These Amendments Would Open the Door to a Dangerous Global Health Bureaucracy Read More »

Human Rights Discarded at the Gates of Hell

Human Rights Discarded at the Gates of Hell

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Human rights claims are claims by citizens on governments. The advocacy, juridical, and enforcement revolutions in human rights led to a rapid expansion of governmental activism on legislation backed by monitoring and compliance machinery. Yet human rights are also abused most systematically, pervasively and widely by governments. 

Human Rights Discarded at the Gates of Hell Read More »

EUA Countermeasures are Neither Investigational nor Experimental

EUA Countermeasures Are Neither Investigational nor Experimental

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Judge Hughes is correct that it is “false and irrelevant” to call Covid injections experimental and dangerous. It is false because EUA is not experimental and can never be. It is irrelevant because safety is irrelevant to EUA, which gets issued based on opinions and not approved based on data. There is no way to collect clinical trial data and collate it such that an assessment of risk benefit (as defined in FDCA) can be made.

EUA Countermeasures Are Neither Investigational nor Experimental Read More »

To Whom Should the Right of Speech Belong?

To Whom Should the Right of Speech Belong?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Judge Doughty’s injunction may have flaws, but on the question of whether it advances or hinders free speech in the United States, the answer is undeniable. Missouri v. Biden is a litmus test for Americans. Either the Government has a right to curate citizens’ newsfeeds by using the power of the federal government to nationalize our information centers, or we embrace the First Amendment and unshackle ourselves from the militarized system of informational warfare that has dominated our airwaves for over three years.

To Whom Should the Right of Speech Belong? Read More »

Covid mRNA Vaccines, a Military Countermeasure, Required No Safety Oversight 

Covid mRNA Vaccines Required No Safety Oversight 

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccines was based on clinical trials and manufacturing processes conducted with no binding legal standards, no legally proscribed safety oversight or regulation, and no legal redress from the manufacturer for potential harms. (This last point is being challenged in multiple court cases, so far to no avail.)

Covid mRNA Vaccines Required No Safety Oversight  Read More »

How New Zealand Centralizes Medicine

Locking in Mandated Medicine by Short-Circuiting Democracy

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

What we see in command medication and digital is a general failure to require and include in these policies a place for the production of scientific information that might challenge or contradict claims of safety. The feedback loops are not sophisticated, open, and transparent enough. They never will be.

Locking in Mandated Medicine by Short-Circuiting Democracy Read More »

Freedom and Virtue: Friends or Enemies?

Freedom and Virtue: Friends or Enemies?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Across the West, Virtue People, and Freedom People have been working together. At conferences, in think tanks, at school boards, on email lists, in living rooms, on X, and sometimes marching in the streets, they coalesce. These two groups constitute the rebel alliance against authoritarian woke globalism. But their political philosophies conflict.

Freedom and Virtue: Friends or Enemies? Read More »

Pandemics as a Catalyst for a New World Order

Pandemics as a Catalyst for a New World Order

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

By globally synchronizing the public health response across the United Nations member states, new powers were granted to the UN and its organizations at the cost of national sovereignty. These universally applied regulations and multilateral agreements have given birth to an enlarged, globalized administrative state.

Pandemics as a Catalyst for a New World Order Read More »

Stay Informed with Brownstone Institute