The Fifth Big Lie of Vaccinology
It would be revealing to perform a detailed review of the websites of the CDC, FDA, and State Health Departments to obtain a total count of the propagandistic use of the “safe and effective” slogan.
It would be revealing to perform a detailed review of the websites of the CDC, FDA, and State Health Departments to obtain a total count of the propagandistic use of the “safe and effective” slogan.
Evidence continues to mount indicating that the global response to the Covid-19 pandemic was counterproductive and harmful, yet mainstream opinion continues to proclaim that it was a triumph. This is based on scientific papers that often manipulate the data.
The Heart of the Matter: Cardiac Risks of Covid-19 Vaccines Continue Reading
The Fourth Big Lie of Vaccinology – declaring multiple simultaneous injections to be safe – is a reckless false assumption that has no scientific basis. The simultaneous administration of multiple different vaccines, especially in children, is now standard practice in the United States.
To summarize, this set of results does not demonstrate “real-world” effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines against symptomatic infection in a vulnerable nursing home population. Nor did the data from a study of Covid mortality of nursing home residents in Israel.
An Open Letter to the Editor of The New England Journal of Medicine Continue Reading
Among the many incredible revelations over the past five years is the extent of the power of the pharmaceutical companies. Through advertising, they have been able to shape media content. That in turn has affected digital content companies.
How Long Has Industry Captured Vaccine Regulation? Continue Reading
The unvaccinated are also the segment of the population that resists the tyrannical impulses so inherent to vaccinology. Mandatory vaccination of an entire population is not imposed to eradicate disease. It is imposed to eradicate the unvaccinated.
No medical product should ever be allowed to be brought to market and administered to patients on the basis of “relative efficacy.” After all, these products aren’t marketed to consumers as “relatively safe and effective,” are they?
ACIP was still erring on the side of Pharma, which they presumably have to due to the sponsored-Congress problem. They may have got it right, they may not. Now the onus is on someone to do sensible prospective trials.
Antibody production is not immunity to disease. The promotion of this false equivalency represents the first Big Lie of vaccinology. It should be rejected by regulators and patients alike as legitimate evidence of vaccine efficacy in the future.
In terms of importance, the Covid-19 pandemic was the biggest event in human history since World War II. Since that time, nothing has caused as much fear across the entire planet as what began in 2020.
The Pandemic Revealed the Most Cowardly Society of All Time Continue Reading
The proposed ACIP voting questions do not go far enough to address documented safety problems. Moving the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine to 2 months would only produce a small reduction in autism and SIDS rates. Combination shots are NOT safer.
Transcript of My Public Comment at the ACIP Meeting Continue Reading
Such proposed reforms do seem like legitimate recommendations that would allow for the progression of science and the continuation of worthwhile work while also serving as important first steps in cleaning the Augean stable that science in academia has become.
Cleaning the Augean Stable of University-Based Scientific Research Continue Reading