Public Health

In-depth, ongoing analysis of public health, social policy, and public policy, exploring their wide-ranging impacts on economics, open dialogue, freedom of speech, personal liberties, and everyday social life.

Our articles critically examine government interventions, pandemic responses, mandates, medical narratives, and their effects on society. From COVID policies and vaccine debates to broader issues like cancer warnings, mental health treatments, food systems, and human rights.

All public health articles are translated into multiple languages to reach a global audience and foster international discussion.

WHO’s New Pandemic Approach: Expediency over Evidence?

WHO’s New Pandemic Approach: Expediency over Evidence?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Pandemics will happen. The world will benefit from an international health organization that can help coordinate rational responses, whilst also assisting in managing other public health priorities. The WHO risks making the latter worse by abandoning a robust evidence-based approach.

WHO’s New Pandemic Approach: Expediency over Evidence? Read Journal Article

The Heart of the Matter: Cardiac Risks of Covid-19 Vaccines

The Heart of the Matter: Cardiac Risks of Covid-19 Vaccines

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Evidence continues to mount indicating that the global response to the Covid-19 pandemic was counterproductive and harmful, yet mainstream opinion continues to proclaim that it was a triumph. This is based on scientific papers that often manipulate the data.

The Heart of the Matter: Cardiac Risks of Covid-19 Vaccines Read Journal Article

Should Argentina Leave the WHO?

Should Argentina Leave the WHO?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

By engaging selectively, aligning with the United States, and preserving the option of withdrawal, Argentina positions itself to influence the future of global health governance rather than being shaped by it. This strategy safeguards sovereignty in a rapidly changing international environment.

Should Argentina Leave the WHO? Read Journal Article

How Social Media Has Distorted Medical Judgment

How Social Media Has Distorted Medical Judgment

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

As John Adams wisely reminded us, “Liberty must at all hazards be supported.” This includes the liberty to think critically, to question established norms, to engage in debate, and to practice medicine guided by empirical evidence rather than algorithmic determinism.

How Social Media Has Distorted Medical Judgment Read Journal Article

Join the Brownstone Community
Get our FREE Journal Newsletter