Some commentary on the debate went back and forth in the Group. I received an email from Google Groups stating that they had “permanently removed” my content because “an external report flagged the content for illegal content or policy violations.”
Censors Everywhere We Look Continue Reading
In her majority opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett bent over sideways to avoid judging the case on its merits and focused instead on whether or not the plaintiffs had the right, or standing, to ask for and be granted relief.
Court Ruling on Murthy Misses Point Entirely Continue Reading
We will continue to fight the government’s censorship leviathan in court. As the case goes back to the District Court for trial, we anticipate more discovery. Perhaps we will uncover communications that meet the Supreme Court’s impossibly high traceability standard.
Supreme Court Punts on Technicalities Continue Reading
The WikiLeaks document dumps caused embarrassment to some governments. However, for all the repetitions of the charge against Assange that he put the lives of US and allied soldiers at risk, no credible evidence has been produced that this happened.
Self-Inflicted Harm: The Persecution of Assange Continue Reading
The world desperately needs far more whistleblowers. We need an active and robust WikiLeaks…or more organizations that perform the vital work of WikiLeaks. The people who could disclose important information about government crimes are simply terrified to do this.
Assange and the Whistleblowers That Could’ve Been Continue Reading
Karma has caught up with the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), which will be scaled back to just three staff, according to the Washington Post. The contracts of its leading protagonists, Alex Stamos and Renee DiResta, have not been renewed.
Karma Catches Up to the Stanford Internet Observatory Continue Reading
Government found a way into social media via direct intimidation, third-party services, and revolving doors with agencies. The majority opinion here has found a way to codify this new form of censorship that threatens the idea of free speech itself.
The Court Greenlights Censorship Continue Reading
After years of confinement, Julian Assange stands on the verge of freedom after agreeing to a guilty plea in exchange for his release. His persecution provides a reminder of how the powerful will usurp our rights to advance their interests.
Lessons from the Persecution of Assange Continue Reading
We know that the Intelligence Community was heavily involved in censoring Americans on many issues. So if anyone is interested in who initiated and enforced censorship of dissenting Covid voices, they should ask the following questions of Fauci under oath…
Jim Jordan Should Ask Fauci This… Continue Reading
Ofcom referred to me in public documents as a “conspiracy theorist,” using that discrediting characterization of my work, as part of its decision to penalize Steyn for airing the show in which I brought forth the evidence I did.
Dr. Wolf’s Statement to the Royal Courts of Justice Continue Reading
If you hear your pharmacist, physician, or academic dean parrot the malignant regurgitated trope of “Ivermectin doesn’t work for Covid” or that there is “no evidence” or “no data” to support ivermectin’s use in Covid-19, send them this meta-analysis summary and annotated bibliography of over 100 studies.
Send This Article to People Who Say “Ivermectin Doesn’t Work for Covid-19” Continue Reading
The oral arguments in the free-speech case did not increase hopes for a solid outcome. But long experience suggests that oral arguments can be misleading. The briefs and the case law are what are decisive. If the NRA case is any indication, free speech advocates might have a new basis for hope in the wisdom of the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court Just Gave Us Hope Continue Reading
