Government

Government articles provide in-depth analysis of government agencies and their profound impacts on economics, public health, public dialogue, individual liberty, social life, and personal freedoms.

Brownstone critically examines overreach, surveillance programs, digital ID systems, bureaucratic fraud, public health mandates, international organizations (e.g., WHO), national security policies, and emerging threats like technocratic control and institutional trust erosion. Topics include government-controlled digital IDs, vaccine policy shifts, autism guidance revisions, antidepressant information wars, sovereignty vs. global governance, and pathways to policy reform that prioritize human rights, free markets, and open society.

All government articles from Brownstone Institute are translated into multiple languages to enable global access, foster international open dialogue, and support readers worldwide in challenging centralized power and promoting evidence-based alternatives.

Censorship and the Criminalization of Election Integrity

Censorship and the Criminalization of Election Integrity

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

No political actor has been more influential in overturning election integrity efforts than Marc Elias. He led the crusade to overturn the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, which banned “drop boxes” in the state.

Censorship and the Criminalization of Election Integrity Read Journal Article

Washington Post Subscribers Throw Temper Tantrum

Washington Post Subscribers Throw Temper Tantrum

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

At least 200,000 subscribers of the nation’s second-most-important newspaper threw a temper tantrum because the paper’s Establishment stenographers would not endorse Harris. If this doesn’t provide a “tell” about the political views of large swaths of the country, nothing will.

Washington Post Subscribers Throw Temper Tantrum Read Journal Article

Did Government-Sponsored Disinformation Worsen Covid-19?

Did Government-Sponsored Disinformation Worsen Covid-19?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The Fors Marsh campaign deployed fear-based messaging to influence public behavior to comply with CDC and other USG recommendations. The intentional promotion of fear of death from an infectious disease disproportionate to actual risk of death is psychological bioterrorism.

Did Government-Sponsored Disinformation Worsen Covid-19? Read Journal Article

Join the Brownstone Community
Get our FREE Journal Newsletter