Brownstone Journal

Brownstone Journal features in-depth articles, news, research, and commentary on public health, science, economics, social theory, and related policy issues — offering critical perspectives on institutional failures, government interventions, and threats to liberty.

Explore topics like vaccine trials, post-pandemic public sentiment, cancer screening dilemmas, weight loss drugs, food systems, digital ID, antidepressants, pandemic profit motives, collapse in public trust, and paths to evidence-based reform, personal freedoms, and a healthier society.

All Brownstone Institute articles are translated into multiple languages to reach global readers, foster international dialogue, and support challenges to centralized narratives worldwide.

Brownstone » Brownstone Journal
Is There Hope for International Rule of Law?

Is There Hope for International Rule of Law?

By / / , , / 4 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Have governments realized that they have been misled by repetitive G20, WHO, and the World Bank’s messages that there would be more harmful pandemics to come and that the world urgently needs new pandemic agreements? If they return to their senses, there may still be time for them to use Article 56(5) IHR to raise disagreement with the WHO’s interpretation of Article 55(2) to the coming WHA, demanding a deferral of the vote until legal requirements are fulfilled.

Is There Hope for International Rule of Law? Continue Reading

The WHO’s Proposed Pandemic Agreements Worsen Public Health

The WHO’s Proposed Pandemic Agreements Worsen Public Health

By / / , , / 7 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

To summarize, while it’s sensible to prepare for outbreaks and pandemics, it’s even more sensible to improve health. This involves directing resources to where the problems are and using them in a way that does more good than harm. When people’s salaries and careers become dependent on changing reality, reality gets warped. The new pandemic proposals are very warped. They are a business strategy, not a public health strategy. It is the business of wealth concentration and colonialism – as old as humanity itself.

The WHO’s Proposed Pandemic Agreements Worsen Public Health Continue Reading

Legal Context Behind the Bioweapon Hypothesis

Legal Context Behind the Bioweapon Hypothesis

By / / , , / 6 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

EUA was the type of authorization granted to Covid mRNA vaccines, along with hundreds of other medical products used during the declared Covid pandemic. Once we understand the basic legal framework, we can investigate the most important aspect of EUA that nobody ever discusses: the context in which EUA law operates.

Legal Context Behind the Bioweapon Hypothesis Continue Reading

Another Damning EU Vaccine Safety Report

Another Damning EU Vaccine Safety Report

By / / , / 11 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Germany had the highest number of recorded cases, a total of 114,573, which accounted for 22.5% of all worldwide cases for that 6-month period. It is worth noting that from December 2020 through to June 2022, a staggering 323,684 individual reports of suspected Covid-19 vaccine side effects were received by The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, an Agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health. Yet, despite this large number, Karl Lauterbach, Germany’s Minister for Health, known for his pro-lockdown and pro-vaccine stance, made the unsubstantiated claim that the “vaccine was without side effects” in August 2021.

Another Damning EU Vaccine Safety Report Continue Reading

WHO Pandemic Agreement April Draft: Additional Concerns

WHO Pandemic Agreement April Draft: Additional Concerns

By / / , / 11 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The World Health Organization (WHO) negotiating body of the draft Pandemic Agreement to be voted on in late May produced yet another draft. As the previous text was dealt with in detail in a recent article, it seems relevant to provide a brief summary of the additional changes. As before, the document becomes vaguer but adds more activities to be funded, reinforcing the concerns that this process is being rushed without due review.

WHO Pandemic Agreement April Draft: Additional Concerns Continue Reading

The Vanguard Behind Australia's Misinformation Bill

The Vanguard Behind Australia’s Misinformation Bill

By / / , , / 11 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Australia has been out in front in shaping the bureaucratised internet: the eSafety Commissioner is touted as the first online “harm regulator” in the world and as recently detailed, is deeply embedded in the global networks driving this push, from the World Economic Forum, to the EU, to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, and beyond.

The Vanguard Behind Australia’s Misinformation Bill Continue Reading

Public Health by Way of the Surveillance State

Public Health by Way of the Surveillance State

By / / , / 6 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Should an animal test positive for a Foreign Animal Disease (FAD), the Covid-19 science tells us that isolation and quarantine are vital steps to take to stop the spread of infection. Both actions are much easier to accomplish in smaller decentralized herds, where natural immunity then becomes herd immunity. However, rather than working with states to rapidly approve more localized processing facilities, the USDA and the EPA are instead working to shut them down.

Public Health by Way of the Surveillance State Continue Reading

Medical Elites' Disgrace Over Ivermectin

ASHP, AMA, and APhA’s Remarkable Disgrace on Their Ivermectin Statements

By / / , / 10 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

In the wake of the FDA settling a lawsuit brought against it for wantonly and aggressively smearing ivermectin, the agency has deleted its postings. That’s good, but we shouldn’t forget how egregiously it mischaracterized the drug, ignored copious evidence in its favor, and portrayed its proponents as dangerous crackpots.

ASHP, AMA, and APhA’s Remarkable Disgrace on Their Ivermectin Statements Continue Reading

Congress' Unscientific Spillover

Congress’ Unscientific Spillover

By / / , / 35 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

One hopes the “good guys” win in the end, but that is never a given. If we want the good guys to win and if we want science to be all it can be for society, we need to push back against dishonest grifters like Daszak, bad numbers from Baric, publication biases in Elsevier, funding biases in NIAID, excessive influence in science from leading health science funders, and all the other social malignancies that undermine science.

Congress’ Unscientific Spillover Continue Reading

Open Letter to the People: The Time is Now

Open Letter to the People: The Time is Now

By / / , , / 10 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

I therefore appeal to all of you – particularly those who have thus far lived in denial –who read this open letter, to find fortitude, resilience, and above all, courage and faith in yourselves, that we can and will succeed in ridding the world of the wicked coterie of technocratic neo-fascists hiding under the umbrella of the UN, the WEF, and the WHO, so that we can reassert our ethical and political rights and duties toward one another in a world dedicated to peace instead of internecine war at many levels. Humanity has always striven for peace as an ideal; it is worth doing so again.

Open Letter to the People: The Time is Now Continue Reading

The Latent Fascism of Today’s Anti-Fascists

The Latent Fascism of Today’s Anti-Fascists

By / / , , / 14 minute read / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The terms “fascist” and “fascism” are continuously bandied about today. But those who use these words most seem to understand them least, such that many of today’s self-styled anti-fascists paradoxically take on the central features of fascism to an extraordinary degree.

The Latent Fascism of Today’s Anti-Fascists Continue Reading

Urgent Pandemic Messaging of WHO, World Bank, and G20 is Inconsistent with Their Evidence Base

Urgent Pandemic Messaging of the WHO, World Bank, and G20 is Inconsistent with Their Evidence Base

By / / , / 1 minute of reading / Articles
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Disproportionate pandemic preparedness based on these false premises risks a significant opportunity cost through unnecessary diversion of financial and political resources away from global health priorities of higher burden.

Urgent Pandemic Messaging of the WHO, World Bank, and G20 is Inconsistent with Their Evidence Base Continue Reading

Join the Brownstone Community
Get our FREE Journal Newsletter