en 
VDARE is not everyone’s cup of tea, and its content is certainly outside the mainstream. But are we willing to sit by as weaponized censors impose an information flow for a population of people treated as children by political elites?
Letitia James vs. VDARE and the First Amendment Read Journal Article
SCOTUS will agree that Kennedy has standing and the Supreme Court will have to consider the evidentiary record and make a ruling on the merits. I don’t see how they can avoid giving us a favorable ruling.
Missouri v. Biden/Kennedy v. Biden Update Read Journal Article
Calls for deportation of a comedy band over a failed joke…in the wake of the failed assassination attempt on Donald Trump, it’s conservatives who have led the charge to cancel their political enemies over speech.
The consolidation of advertising and its control by states strikes at the heart of what free economies are supposed to be about. And yet, states that desire maximum control over the public mind must go there.
Censorship and the Corruption of Advertising Read Journal Article
The Supreme Court itself is a victim of the censorship it now downplays. The majority does not understand the media dynamics of the Internet. It doesn’t grasp the interwoven array of public, private, and non-profit players working to suppress information.
But for X, the last 24 hours would have looked very different: nothing but propaganda, apart from a few marginal places here and there. Therein lies another irony: the way X is managed is increasing trust rather than reducing it.
During the Crisis, Free Speech Worked Brilliantly Read Journal Article
Regarding the Murthy v. Missouri aftermath, I’m hearing a lot of confusion about the ruling and its implications on Americans’ everyday lives, so I’m going to explain it here to help clear up the misconceptions that abound.
Some commentary on the debate went back and forth in the Group. I received an email from Google Groups stating that they had “permanently removed” my content because “an external report flagged the content for illegal content or policy violations.”
In her majority opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett bent over sideways to avoid judging the case on its merits and focused instead on whether or not the plaintiffs had the right, or standing, to ask for and be granted relief.
Court Ruling on Murthy Misses Point Entirely Read Journal Article
We will continue to fight the government’s censorship leviathan in court. As the case goes back to the District Court for trial, we anticipate more discovery. Perhaps we will uncover communications that meet the Supreme Court’s impossibly high traceability standard.
The WikiLeaks document dumps caused embarrassment to some governments. However, for all the repetitions of the charge against Assange that he put the lives of US and allied soldiers at risk, no credible evidence has been produced that this happened.
Self-Inflicted Harm: The Persecution of Assange Read Journal Article
The world desperately needs far more whistleblowers. We need an active and robust WikiLeaks…or more organizations that perform the vital work of WikiLeaks. The people who could disclose important information about government crimes are simply terrified to do this.
Assange and the Whistleblowers That Could’ve Been Read Journal Article
German
French
Italian
Spanish
Portuguese
Dutch
Danish
Swedish
Polish
Czech
Armenian
Russian
Romanian
Turkish
Japanese
Korean
Chinese (Simplified)
Hindi
Swahili
Amharic
Yoruba
