Law

Law articles feature analysis and commentary related to censorship, policy, technology, media, economics, public health, and social life.

All Brownstone Institute articles on the topic of law are translated into multiple languages.

The WHO Wants to Rule the World - Brownstone Institute

The WHO Wants to Rule the World

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The World Health Organisation (WHO) will present two new texts for adoption by its governing body, the World Health Assembly comprising delegates from 194 member states, in Geneva on 27 May–1 June. The new pandemic treaty needs a two-thirds majority for approval and, if and once adopted, will come into effect after 40 ratifications.

The WHO Wants to Rule the World Read Journal Article

Theft by Lockdown - Brownstone Institute

Theft by Lockdown

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The “welfare clause,” referring originally to the loose collective of the states under the Articles of Confederation, and the concocted “rights of the community,” either alone or in combination, do not (maybe, “shouldn’t”) excuse Theft-by-Lockdown. We know the Constitution doesn’t allow exceptions for fear or being afraid. Neither do the Articles of Confederation. That’s fortunate since we also know the Revolution – a cause for fear all on its own – was fought during a smallpox pandemic – a secondary cause for fear.

Theft by Lockdown Read Journal Article

The Irish Government Failed to Redefine the Family - Brownstone Institute

The Irish Government Failed to Redefine the Family

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Last Friday, a large majority of Irish voters (67.7%) rejected their government’s proposal to insert a new definition of the family into the Constitution, in which “durable relationships” and not just a marital bond, could form the legal basis for the family unit. They also rejected – by a historically unprecedented landslide of 73.9% – a proposal to replace a clause expressing support for the care work of mothers in the home with a gender-neutral recognition of care work by “members of a family.”

The Irish Government Failed to Redefine the Family Read Journal Article

Ketanji Brown Jackson Defenestrates the First Amendment - Brownstone Institute

Ketanji Brown Jackson Defenestrates the First Amendment

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

At her confirmation hearings, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson claimed she lacked the expertise to define “woman.” Just two years later, she did not hesitate to redefine the First Amendment and free speech as she advocated for the regime to bulldoze our Constitutional liberties provided they offer sufficiently sanctimonious justifications.

Ketanji Brown Jackson Defenestrates the First Amendment Read Journal Article

The PREP Act Swallowed the Bill of Rights - Brownstone Institute

The PREP Act Swallowed the Bill of Rights

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The US sold its citizens’ right to jury trials to the country’s largest lobbying force, and Americans now bear the costs after Pharma cashed record profits. The PREP Act, a 2005 statute invoked by HHS Secretary Alex Azar at the onset of the pandemic, guarantees immunity “with respect to all claims caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a covered countermeasure,” including mRNA vaccines.

The PREP Act Swallowed the Bill of Rights Read Journal Article

Australian Court Blocks Covid Vaccine Challenge - Brownstone Institute

Australian Court Blocks Covid Vaccine Challenge

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

A judge who previously provided legal counsel to Pfizer has blocked a legal challenge over Moderna’s and Pfizer’s mRNA Covid vaccines, stalling efforts to raise the alarm over alleged unregulated genetically modified organisms (GMOs), including high levels of DNA contamination, in the vials.

Australian Court Blocks Covid Vaccine Challenge Read Journal Article

Can the Chief Justice Stand Up to the Censors? - Brownstone Institute

Can the Chief Justice Stand Up to the Censors?

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

It is not just the Court’s power to remedy usurpations of our liberty, but it is its duty. The Chief has been derelict in the past, deferring to the capricious whims of political opportunists, but Murthy v. Missouri offers the Chief an opportunity to reaffirm his Court’s commitment to the Constitution. 

Can the Chief Justice Stand Up to the Censors? Read Journal Article

Constitutional Crisis and Murthy v. Biden - Brownstone Institute

Constitutional Crisis and Murthy v. Missouri

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

In two weeks, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Murthy v. Biden (formerly known as Missouri v. Biden) to consider whether to uphold an injunction that bars the White House, CDC, FBI, CISA, and Surgeon General’s Office from coercing or encouraging social media companies from censoring constitutionally protected speech. 

Constitutional Crisis and Murthy v. Missouri Read Journal Article

Join the Brownstone Community
Get our FREE Journal Newsletter