Brownstone Journal

Articles, News, Research, and Commentary on public health, science, economics, & social theory

  • All
  • Censorship
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Government
  • History
  • Law
  • Masks
  • Media
  • Pharma
  • Philosophy
  • Policy
  • Psychology
  • Public Health
  • Society
  • Technology
  • Vaccines
Focused Protection: Jay Bhattacharya, Sunetra Gupta, and Martin Kulldorff

It All Began with Fear

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

When Covid-19 came along, Laura Dodsworth grew alarmed—not at the virus, but at the fear swirling around it. She watched the fear grow legs and wings and wrap itself around her country. What troubled her most was that her government, historically charged with keeping people calm during times of crisis, seemed to be amplifying the fear. The media, which she had expected to push back against government edicts, gave the fear train an extra shove.

It All Began with Fear Read More

Farrar eugenics

Covid Insider Farrar and His Eugenics Agenda

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Let’s call a spade a spade and go back to calling this what we used to call it – eugenics. And be ever mindful as the WHO pandemic treaty and vaccine passport projects continue, with the potential for your DNA to become the means by which your identification is verified, that the man who will soon be in charge of setting the global agenda for it is Sir Jeremy Farrar.  

Covid Insider Farrar and His Eugenics Agenda Read More

big tech colluded with government

How Government and Big Tech Colluded to Usurp Constitutional rights

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Not only did the government turn its capability on the American people, but it recruited the most powerful information companies in the history of the world to advance its agenda, leaving American citizens poorer, stripped of their rights, and left with no place to hide.

How Government and Big Tech Colluded to Usurp Constitutional rights Read More

WHO IHR human rights

Amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations: An Annotated Guide

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The amendments to the IHR are intended to fundamentally change the relationship between individuals, their country’s governments, and the WHO. They place the WHO as having rights overriding that of individuals, erasing the basic principles developed after World War Two regarding human rights and the sovereignty of States. In doing so, they signal a return to a colonialist and feudalist approach fundamentally different to that to which people in relatively democratic countries have become accustomed. The lack of major pushback by politicians and the lack of concern in the media and consequent ignorance of the general public is therefore both strange and alarming.

Amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations: An Annotated Guide Read More

A Freudian Critique of the Pandemic Response

A Freudian Critique of the Pandemic Response

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Considering that Freud associates the life instinct (Eros) with the aggregation of families and communities, and with the panoply of creative endeavours comprising culture, and its antithesis, the death instinct (Thanatos), with decomposition, diverse kinds of destruction, and with aggressiveness, the current predominance of the latter – Thanatos – in the world should be obvious, if not conspicuous.

A Freudian Critique of the Pandemic Response Read More

fall of academia and universities

The Decline and Fall of the University

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Academia was full of eccentric professors with various crazy ideas and habits (some brilliant), naïve students, and pompous administrators; but they all adhered to the same standard of knowledge. This led not just to scientific discovery and technological progress, but to every other kind of progress: economic, political, social, and ethical.

The Decline and Fall of the University Read More

The Unvaccinated

How the “Unvaccinated” Got It Right

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The continued insistence on rolling out the “vaccine” to the entire population when the data revealed that those with no comorbidities were at low risk of severe illness or death from COVID was therefore immoral and ascientific on its face. The argument that reduced transmission from the non-vulnerable to the vulnerable as a result of mass “vaccination” could only stand if the long-term safety of the “vaccine” had been established, which it had not.

How the “Unvaccinated” Got It Right Read More

Focused Protection: Jay Bhattacharya, Sunetra Gupta, and Martin Kulldorff

Blindsight Is 2020

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Epidemiologists can do epidemiology. Public health experts can do public health. But none of these experts can do society or human nature any better than intellectuals from other disciplines or even “ordinary people.” No scientist has the legal or moral authority to tell someone they can’t sit next to a parent on their deathbed. 

Blindsight Is 2020 Read More

eugenics

Eugenics, Then and Now 

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

We have solid historical and contemporary proof that eugenic ambitions are capable of sweeping up the most elite intellectuals and policy circles. The dream of curating the population by force to make it more fit is a historical reality and not nearly as discredited as people tend to believe. It can always make a return in new guise, with new language, and new excuses. 

Eugenics, Then and Now  Read More

Stay Informed with Brownstone Institute