Brownstone Journal

Brownstone Journal features in-depth articles, news, research, and commentary on public health, science, economics, social theory, and related policy issues — offering critical perspectives on institutional failures, government interventions, and threats to liberty.

Explore topics like vaccine trials, post-pandemic public sentiment, cancer screening dilemmas, weight loss drugs, food systems, digital ID, antidepressants, pandemic profit motives, collapse in public trust, and paths to evidence-based reform, personal freedoms, and a healthier society.

All Brownstone Institute articles are translated into multiple languages to reach global readers, foster international dialogue, and support challenges to centralized narratives worldwide.

Brownstone » Brownstone Journal
FDA Knows That China and India Drug Quality Is Poor, But Independently Collects and Tests Only about 0.001%

FDA Knows That China and India Drug Quality Is Poor, But Independently Collects and Tests Only about 0.001%

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Trusting for-profit, overseas manufacturers to police themselves on quality control via self-selected “mailed-in” sampling doesn’t work. Patients filling prescriptions hoping to treat a critical medical condition could instead be adversely affected with impure products stealthily making them even sicker.

FDA Knows That China and India Drug Quality Is Poor, But Independently Collects and Tests Only about 0.001% Read Journal Article

Censorship and the Criminalization of Election Integrity

Censorship and the Criminalization of Election Integrity

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

No political actor has been more influential in overturning election integrity efforts than Marc Elias. He led the crusade to overturn the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, which banned “drop boxes” in the state.

Censorship and the Criminalization of Election Integrity Read Journal Article

Washington Post Subscribers Throw Temper Tantrum

Washington Post Subscribers Throw Temper Tantrum

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

At least 200,000 subscribers of the nation’s second-most-important newspaper threw a temper tantrum because the paper’s Establishment stenographers would not endorse Harris. If this doesn’t provide a “tell” about the political views of large swaths of the country, nothing will.

Washington Post Subscribers Throw Temper Tantrum Read Journal Article

Join the Brownstone Community
Get our FREE Journal Newsletter