Masks

Masks articles feature analysis and commentary related to mask mandates, masking policy, research, public health, and social life.

All masks articles at Brownstone Institute are machine translated into multiple languages.

  • All
  • Censorship
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Government
  • History
  • Law
  • Masks
  • Media
  • Pharma
  • Philosophy
  • Policy
  • Psychology
  • Public Health
  • Society
  • Technology
  • Vaccines
mask induced exhaustion syndrome

Long Covid Could be Mask Induced Exhaustion Syndrome (MIES)

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Can masks be responsible for a misinterpreted long-COVID-19-syndrome after an effectively treated COVID-19 infection? Nearly 40% of main long-COVID-19 symptoms overlap with mask related complaints and symptoms described by Kisielinski et al. as MIES like fatigue, dyspnea, confusion, anxiety, depression, tachycardia, dizziness, and headache, which we also detected in the qualitative and quantitative analysis of face mask effects in our systematic review. It is possible that some symptoms attributed to long-COVID-19 are predominantly mask-related.

Long Covid Could be Mask Induced Exhaustion Syndrome (MIES) Read More

Tufekci and Howard

How Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard Masked America

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Tufekci and Howard played a decisive role in affecting this vast shift in scientific guidance that so intimately affected the lives of every American, which the Cochrane review has now shown to have afforded no benefit at the population level, for dubious reasons such as “shaping new societal norms.” Throughout COVID, Tufekci pushed false information and harmful policies that were far afield of her expertise based on information from China, despite knowing such information was unreliable, without ever admitting or apologizing for the errors once the harms became manifest.

How Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard Masked America Read More

war on science

The Latest in the War on Science

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

We do not know what spooked the Editor in Chief, but given the speed and highly unprofessional nature of the reaction, could it be one of their big funders?  How the decision was made to undermine the review so quickly and so well – was it a prepared strategy? Finally, the relationship between all this and the NYT opinion piece published on 10 October is unclear.  Nor have the Editors of Cochrane had the decency to explain what happened and what the haste was for. Therefore, why were folk working on the review since 2006 not consulted?

The Latest in the War on Science Read More

Eye Protection Wasn’t Misdirection

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Consider all of the people you’ve seen donning masks or respirators over these past three years, assured in the merit of their virtue. How many still got sick? Did you ever once see someone donning goggles? Are we ever going to get around to discussing exhaustion of the hierarchy of controls, or are actual mitigating measures too taboo, too fringe? 

Eye Protection Wasn’t Misdirection Read More

scientists

It’s Open Season on Scientists

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

We warned our readers a couple of weeks back that opinion pieces were taking on the role of editors of scientific journals. We stated, “The arguments put forward are virtually all the same: loud, strident and based on the poorest quality evidence available.“ Unfortunately, this was the case with the Cochrane Review on Physical Interventions to interrupt the spread of respiratory viruses.

It’s Open Season on Scientists Read More

cochrane fact check

Cochrane Fact-Checked with Absurd Results

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Considering how this seriously flawed article is now apparently used to suppress the dissemination of an important scientific paper, to press the Cochrane editor-in-chief into making false claims about the objective of the paper and downplay its results, and to censor a review of the findings by an important mainstream newspaper, there is clearly an urgent need to act strongly against the so called “fact-checking” industry.

Cochrane Fact-Checked with Absurd Results Read More

masks ineffective

Cochrane Ends the Masking Rage 

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Even before the pandemic, the best available evidence – randomized controlled trials – already showed that masks are ineffective in containing respiratory viral transmission. Additional RCTs conducted during the pandemic support this conclusion. Therefore, the best available evidence does not support even the recommendation of wearing masks, let alone making them compulsory. 

Cochrane Ends the Masking Rage  Read More

Tomas Pueyo

Tomás Pueyo Returns: The MBA Who Shut Down Europe on Masks and the Cochrane Review

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

To this day, it remains unclear where Pueyo got the ideas for virus containment for his 2020 articles. To some degree, Pueyo’s ideas mirrored those of major lockdown proponents like Imperial College Professor Neil Ferguson—architect of the wildly-inaccurate COVID models that instigated lockdowns across the free world—who’d already endorsed global lockdown measures. Yet outside of a niche epidemiology community, these ideas were far from well-known. For the most part, it wasn’t until Pueyo’s articles that these ideas for strict virus containment measures reached the mainstream.

Tomás Pueyo Returns: The MBA Who Shut Down Europe on Masks and the Cochrane Review Read More

mask study

On the Mask Study: An Interview with the Author

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

There’s no evidence that they do work. It’s possible they could work in some settings….we’d know if we’d done trials. All you needed was for Tedros [from WHO] to declare it’s a pandemic and they could have randomised half of the United Kingdom, or half of Italy, to masks and the other half to no masks. But they didn’t. Instead, they ran around like headless chickens.

On the Mask Study: An Interview with the Author Read More

Masks Damage

Masks Did Not Do Nothing; They Wrought Havoc

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The behavioural scientists deliberately exploited the human desire to conform and literally said out loud that the public would ‘do the heavy lifting’ and enforce masks using social pressure. This was the case: if you refused to wear a mask, people stared or even shouted. Twitter shouted #WearADamnMask. Venues denied entry. GPs refused medical appointments to the unmasked.

Masks Did Not Do Nothing; They Wrought Havoc Read More

masking mandates

Mask Mandates in Healthcare Facilities are the Evilest of them All

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Mask requirements for healthcare facilities continue to be sustained in the face of an unrelenting flurry of fatal knockout blows struck by study after study finding that, as a purely scientific matter, masks of any kind are wholly inutile amulets bereft of any discernible impact on the transmission or epidemiology of respiratory viruses.

Mask Mandates in Healthcare Facilities are the Evilest of them All Read More

Freedom from masks

The Freedom Not to Wear a Mask

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

The simple truth is that the one-size-fits-all approach didn’t protect us from the virus as much as it blinded us to its reality; one that only could have been arrived at via freedom. We didn’t need medical studies, and the reality is that still we don’t need medical studies. What we needed and need is freedom. With the latter once again comes knowledge from different people doing different things, and all of us learning from their successes and failures.

The Freedom Not to Wear a Mask Read More

Stay Informed with Brownstone Institute